Skip to main content

Meditation-Sankhya Yoga-Yoga Psychology Based on Experience

The Rishis (Sages) of the past meditated. They included both men (eg Kapila) and women (eg Gargi).
By meditate I mean concentrated focus/observation of their own psychical system.
Meditation is a systems approach.  The rishis went from the surface layers of the mind to probe into deeper levels.  The body is multicellular , including the brain (consisting of the sensory input processing system). Under normal circumstances, in a conditioned human, the physical predominates i.e data arriving from the sense organs (eyes, ears etc) .The  4 components i.e.buddhi-intellect ahamkara-identity/individualization capacity, manas - memory bank , chitta-(awareness at the mental level)are a  prakriti (psychical nature) according to sankhya psychology. The 3 attributes of sattva(balance/equilibrium/harmony),rajas (activity) and tamas (inertia) are present in various combination in each individual human. The observable universe is when the self/atman/purusha/subject/observer/ is superimposed by prakriti.During meditation, the self /atman/purusha/observer loses superimposition of  prakriti in the following manner.  When prakriti is stilled by various techniques like mantra repitition, meditative techniques of raja yoga/patanjali yoga  the observing part (subject/atman) has no more object to observe. Subject-object become one. When the atman/self/purusha/subject/observer  loses identification with the object, (distinct energy fields lose their individual vibrations=detachment in gita where kshetra=field and kshetrajna=knower of the field) the self/atman merges (unite/integrate=yoga) into the underlying unified energy field (brahman) . Thus tat tvam asi. Atman (Individual self-You-tvam) =Brahman (universal-Tat). Emergent consciousness is lost i.e vibrating energy fields is lost and equilibriated/bliss energy fields remain. This is the result of meditation.
Terminology in Advaita(Non-dual)=Atman (Individual Self), Brahman (Universal Self).
Terminology in Sankhya =Buddhi (Intellect), Ahankara (identity), Chitta (mental awareness), Manas (memory bank), Sattva (Balance), Rajas (Activity), Tamas (Inertia).
Terminology in Gita =Kshetra (Field), Kshetragna (Knower of the Field)
Deities-Anthropomorphic representation of abstract attributes.
The various deities of "hinduism" represent various abstract mental states during subject object split. For eg. Shiva represents destruction (Tamas), Vishnu-preservation (Sattva)-Brahma-projection/creation (Rajas) of the universe .This is because prakriti engages in creative, maintaining and destructive activities.
4 experience based paths to the above:Bhakti-Yoga(Love of Self-subject object separation followed by subject object unity), Karma -Yoga (Work /Activity based, Removing focus from fruits of activity but focusing on the activity itself, love of work and work for the sake of work and not for the gains or losses/side effects that accrues with it  ), Raja-Yoga( Patanjali's Ashtanga Yoga System-involves dhyana,dharana,samadhi), Jnana-Yoga(Knower of Self/Advaita based).
Christ who experienced unity is quoted as -do unto others as you would like others to do unto yourself was a bhakta (lover of the self). Buddha was a jnani (knowledge seeker) (meditated on the self).
Loss of  organization  at the physical level/structure =death of the body.
Aging = loss of structure/physical organization.
"God" in "Hinduism"=Atman/IndividualizedSelf which merges into Universal self"Brahman".
Good (Sattv-ic)/Evil (Tamas-ic)=Creative/Destructive mental energy states.
Self knowledge= Atman knowledge

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Assumptions-Are they related to cognitive biases ?

Can we say that an assumption is  a cognitive bias.

Assumption-For what there is no evidence but it is still taken to be true.
Google definition-a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof.


cognitive bias is a mistake in reasoning, evaluating, remembering, or other cognitive process, often occurring as a result of holding onto one's preferences and beliefs regardless of contrary information. 
So when a person is making a select assumption could that person be unknowingly tapping into their inherent cognitive bias e.g. assumption from memory=availability  heuristic cognitive bias.

Based on this argument "all research" in which each piece of research has some sort of hidden assumptions has inherent cognitive biases of the researcher.

Viewpoint-Perspective

The same observation can be made by different human beings. However since each brain acts as a filter the same observation can have a different interpretations depending on that particular person. Therefore the same dataset can be interpreted differently by persons of different caliber/different algorithms/persons with specializations in different subjects.

Naturalism in Ancient India-Speculations

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism-india/

The phenomenal world-A human sees a green leaf. A cat sees a grey leaf. Thus the phenomenal world of experience is a function of the genetic system of  a particular biological species. It is impermanent according to advaita vedanta adherents or advaitins , since it changes from one species to another.
Advaitins ascribe to the "universal conscious principle" underlying it all. To my mind the first thing that comes with the word "universal" in the light of present day theories in the realm of scientific investigation are "entangled energy fields", which vibrate to give rise to particles, which interact to give rise to higher orders of emergence. The word "conscious" implies in normal terms "aware". How can energy fields be aware. Awareness arises from emergence. The word "chit" of sanskrit has been "translated" to consciousness/awareness. "Chit"means &quo…